| Long-term plan: Unit: 3.3C Values (Content with language) | School: |
| Date: | Teacher name: Rakhimova A |
| Grade: 5 | Number present: | absent: |
Theme of the lesson
| A big family |
| Learning objectives(s) that this lesson is contributing to | 5.S4 respond to questions on a limited range of general and some curricular topics5.R2 understand with little support specific information and detail in short, simple texts on a limited range of general and curricular topics |
| Lessonobjectives |
|
| All learners will be able to:3Identify some specific information with considerable support Tell about personal information Most learners will be able to:Explain some specific information with general and some curricular topics with support Define more complex supported questions with support Some learners will be able to:5Give some examples to the specific information from the text without support Organise and present information clearly to others |
| Assessment criteria | Achieve assessment criteria Talk about family |
| Language objectives | read an article about a big familycompare my own family with the one in the article |
| Previous learning | Human beings |
| Cross curricular links | Self- knowledge, Psychology |
| ICT skills | PPT |
Plan
|
| Planned timings | Planned activities | Resources |
3 mins
7 mins | Warm up Find out who in the class has got the biggest family by asking individual students:- How many brothers and sisters have you got?- Whose family is large?- OK- Today we are going to speak about a big family . Pre-reading: T divides learners into 2 groups. Learners work in groups of 2 (mixed abilities) Teacher shows some words on the board. Teacher asks: “Who wants to make up sentences with these words?”Mother – cousin – grandfather – uncle – son – nephew – grandmother – singer – father – niece – aunt Assessment criterion: Learner makes up 3 sentences correctly, pronunciation is good-3 points,Learner makes up 2 sentences correctly is 2 points, Learner makes up 1 sentences correctly is 1 points. |
TableSlide 1 Words on a flipchart
|
Middle10 mins
8 mins
10 mins
| While-reading:-Ask students to read the text.
1.“Mind map Activity Whole classTeacher divides into two groups.
Differentiation by support: peer’s supportTeacher creates mixed ability group. Gifted learners support ungifted learners.
Assessment criteria: -write some key words -draw pictures -opens the content the texts -appealing mind map Post-reading: Task3-Correcting false statements. Whole class
Descriptors A learner Reads the textIdentifies true sentencesIdentifies false sentences and corrects themDifferentiation by outcome:Teacher gives the same task and resources, learners tackle it at their own level and produce outcomes that reflect their understanding of the task and ability to carry it out.
Task 4«Venn diagram». Give students a couple of minutes to make notes on the differences between their family and Damien’s family. Descriptors:Draws and writes with support.Draws and uses the learnt words without support.Explains and compares his work.Analyzes and evaluates his work | Students’ book “Eyes Open”page 12
Slide 2
|
| End5 mins | Reflection 2 stars and a wishFor reflection and feedback ask learner to give 2 stars and one wish concerning the lessonTwo stars = 2 things that they understandabout the lessonA wish = something they can improve to make it even better
|
|
| Additional information |
| Differentiation – how do you plan to give more support? How do you plan to challenge the more able learners? | Assessment – how are you planning to check learners’ learning? | Health and safety checkICT links |
| Support for weaker students: working in pairs/groups, phrasesChallenges for moreable students: Encouraged to do more writing; assist weaker students.Pair work, group work | MonitoringTeacher observation about individual progressFA according to the set criteriaPeer assessment
| Health promoting techniquesBreaks and physical activities used.
|
Reflection
Were the lesson objectives/learning objectives realistic? Did all learners achieve the LO? If not, why?Did my planned differentiation work well? Did I stick to timings? What changes did I make from my plan and why?
|
|
|
|
Summary evaluation
What two things went really well (consider both teaching and learning)?1:
2:
What two things would have improved the lesson (consider both teaching and learning)?1:
2:
What have I learned from this lesson about the class orachievements/difficulties of individuals that will inform my next lesson?
|
ҚР Білім және Ғылым министірлігінің стандартымен жасалған
26 Маусым 2018
889
0 рет жүктелген
