CULTURAL IDENTIFICATION AND
INTERETHNIC RELATIONS IN KAZAKHSTAN
Abstract
Membership in ethnic groups is
salient to positive self-concepts and as a buffer against perceived
discrimination. Ethnic identification takes on special importance
under conditions of perceived discrimination and identity threat.
Our research reported here is based on a survey and partly on
semi-directive interviews conducted with 371 respondents between
the ages of 18 and 31 in city of Karaganda, the central region of
Kazakhstan. Results showed that the Russian and other minorities in
Kazakhstan have perceptions of discrimination that varies from the
majority. Further, the results indicated that the perceptions of
the minorities and majority are partly determined by their
asymmetric relationship. Ethnic identity is especially salient to
minorities that experience identity threat. It can be concluded
that coercive national policies seeking integration is
counter-indicated by the results.
Keywords: Ethnic identity,
discrimination, ethnic groups, minority, research, Kazakhstan,
cross-cultural;
Introduction
Ethnic identity is a central
concept in developmental, social and cross-cultural psychology. A
person’s ethnic identity is based on self-categorization which is
discussed in group categorization research. Research has
demonstrated that mere membership in groups, even if without
identifying meaning, can produce discriminatory behaviors. In
particular Doise, Csepeli, Dann, Gouge, Larsen & Ostell (1972)
demonstrated significant in-group bias by subjects placed into
nonsensical groups demonstrating the power of minimal group
identification. The in-group bias has been demonstrated in a number
of studies. It is thought that ethnic identity serves as a buffer
between perceived discrimination and negative psychological
consequences like depression. The social support experienced in
ethnic identity seems to reduce the symptoms of discrimination and
resulting stress. Further, many studies support the positive
outcomes of ethnic identification for the experiencing of happiness
and improved mental health. This paper will address the role of
ethnic identification among the Kazakh majority and the minorities
of Kazakhstan and in particular the perceived discrimination
experienced by the ethnic groups after the collapse of the
USSR.
Population and the ethnic
composition in Kazakhstan According to the last national census in
2009 16 009 600 people* live in Kazakhstan. The population consists
of 10.1 billion Kazakhs (63.1 %) and 3.8 billion Russians (23.7 %).
The Russians are the biggest minority community of Kazakhstan and
the most important at the political and economic level. All in all,
Kazakhstan have a total of 130 ethnic groups including Uzbeks (2.8
%), Ukrainians (2.1 %), Uyghur (1.4 %), Tartars (1.3 %), Germans
(1.1 %), and also Byelorussians, Koreans, Poles and the others
ethno-cultural groups (together 4.5 %). Linguistic relativity: from
the dominance of Russian to the to the exclusivity of Kazakh
language In Kazakhstan, the Kazakh and Russian languages are both
used in communication. Kazakh is the official national language and
Russian is recognized as the official language of interethnic
communication. The linguistic question in Kazakhstan is at the
heart of numerous debates and is considered by the Russians and the
other ethnic minorities as having produced discriminatory results
favouring the majority.
According to the President of
the Kazakhstani Association of primary school teachers of the
Russian schools, 303 schools teaching in Russian language were
closed in Kazakhstan between 2006 and 2009
Identity and social
categorization
Despite efforts of the
government to build a common national identity in Kazakhstan,
ethnic identity remains a dominant outcome of social
categorization. For all citizens the division into "we" and "they"
refers to membership in an ethnic group. Social categorization
stresses the differences between memberships based on ethnicity
that is reflected in their representation of national identity. The
theory of the social identity suggested that social categorization
is a process of social comparison between groups that allow the
individual to maintain or to reach a positive social identity.
Tajfel made the connection between identity and social
categorization where every individual builds social identity from
membership in certain groups and from the associated emotional and
evaluative meaning. The conflict between ethnic groups in
Kazakhstan is primarily caused by the competition between the
Kazakhs and the Russians. In this situation, each ethnic group
creates its own behavioural models and values. The French
psychologist Lipiansky (1990) characterizes ethnic strategy as
coordinated group operations and actions to affect a positive
self-defined objective. It is a “set of operations" that serve to
avoid or reduce anxiety and social
depreciation.
Objectives of the
research
The main objective of our
research was to understand the place of national identity in the
identity construction of young people belonging to different ethnic
groups (Kazakhs, Russians and the other minorities). The study was
carried out in the city of Karaganda among young people in
interethnic contact.
Methods
Sample
characteristics
Our sample was composed of 371
respondents (48.2 % men and 51.8 % women). Participants were high
school and college students ranging in age from 15 to 31 years old
and surveyed in 2006. The ethnic origin of the sample is as
follows: 95 (25.6 %) Kazakh; 186 (50.1 %) Russian; and 90 (24.3 %)
representatives of other ethnic minority
groups.
Survey
The questionnaire was the main
instrument of the investigation in the study. This method allows
the application of quantitative analysis useful in big samples.
Secondly, survey questions permitted the comparative study between
the several ethnic groups of social representations as proposed
above. Thirdly, the anonymous character of the survey allowed young
people to respond more honestly on sensitive questions related to
attitudes toward other ethnic groups and discrimination in society.
A sixty-four item questionnaire in the Russian language was
developed for the study that included both open-ended and fixed
response categories.
The data
processing
The analysis of the data was
made by the French statistical software “Sphinx Plus²” (version
2003). This program facilitated the statistical analysis of the
data from questions with fixed response categories and allowed for
graphic representations and (Chi 2) tests. The current paper
focuses on the state of interethnic relations in Kazakhstan and the
perception of discrimination between the ethnic
groups
The semi-directive
interview after survey completion
The semi-directive interview
was useful in deepening the interpretation of the results obtained
by the questionnaire. In all, 18 semi-directive conversations were
obtained with the representatives of 3 ethnic groups: six Kazakhs
participants, ten Russian respondents, and two Germans answered
both the questionnaire and agreed to the interview. The structure
of the interview corresponded to the questionnaire and tackled
similar issues. The objective was to adapt the interview to the
questionnaire results of each participant in order to enrich the
understanding and interpretation of the data. Unfortunately, is was
not possible to interview critics of government’s policy of
managing interethnic relations since participants with negative
views refused to leave contact data for
follow-up.
Results and
discussion
It was hypothesized that the
relationships between the Kazakhs and the Russians are determined
by their uneven positions in society. The asymmetric relationships
of “dominating/ dominated” are the primary cause of intergroup
conflict in Kazakhstan. To examine that issue the following
question was asked "In your opinion, what are the present relations
between the young people of different ethnic origins in
Kazakhstan?”. Results of the survey showed that the dominant and
favored Kazakh ethnic sample perceived interethnic relations in
Kazakhstan in more positive terms compared to the Russian and the
other ethnic groups. In fact a large plurality (46.3 %) of the
Kazakh sample describes the character of interethnic relations as
friendly. (Chi2 = 23.32, df = 16, 1- p = 89.45 %). The Russian and
the other ethnic samples were more reserved in their responses and
chose "neutral" to describe interethnic relations more frequently.
This impression is strengthened as the answer "tense relations" is
utilized more by the Russian and the other ethnic groups and both
of these categories perceive interethnic relations in more negative
terms compared to the Kazakhs. As a further example, in the “other
answer” category, the Russian sample asserts that interethnic
relations make them victims of "a hidden racial discrimination".
However, most respondents of all ethnic groups consider interethnic
relations in positive or neutral terms. At the same time, the
character of relations depends to an important degree on the
concrete situation. All ethnic groups recognize that there are
problems in the various domains of social life in Kazakhstan.
However, each ethnic group has its own representation of these
problems. For example, the Kazakhs represent discriminatory
behavior as different from the other groups. The answers of the
Russians and the other minority ethnic groups suggest that cultural
identification of each group determines its perception of ethnic
relationships. The attitudes of respondents toward national
identity An important issue is how the social representations of
national identity are present in different ethnic groups. It was
hypothesized that Kazakhs, Russian and other ethnic groups have
different conceptualizations. It is important to remember that the
survey was conducted in Russian as 98% of respondents learned the
Russian language and only 2.2% understood Kazakh. The respondents
were asked “Do you agree that ethnic origin should be removed from
passport and identification cards?” Please explain your answer.
(Chi2 = 6.54, df = 4, 1-p = 83.75 %). While not significant Kazakhs
(42.1%) indicated the strongest support for removing ethnic
identity from official documents and sought to downplay the
significance of ethnic origin. There is obviously less identity
threat to an ethnic group that is already in control and in the
majority. Russians and the representatives of other groups have a
greater desire to preserve ethnicity in passports and in other
official documents. However, the 38.9% of Kazakhs who wished to
preserve ethnicity is a substantial minority and that result would
suggest that the integration of a common national identity will be
a difficult journey for the state. A content analysis was performed
of the open-ended responses to the question. The results showed
that for the Kazakh majority patriotism and ethnic identity are
inseparable. Therefore as noted above the removal of ethnic origin
does not represent a threat to cultural identity since the words
“Kazakh” and “Kazakhstani” are synonymous. Removal of ethnic
identity will not matter because Kazakhs have the same origin and
Kazakhstan is considered the motherland. Kazakhs who agree with the
removal of ethnicity from official documents believe that such a
move will strengthen feelings of patriotism and will promote the
integration and unification of the country. The term Kazakhstani is
more unifying and by removing ethnic distinctions all ethnic groups
will be more likely to integrate into one nation and the people
will be motivated toward achieving a common future. However
Russians and other ethnic minorities consider the idea of the
removal of ethnic identity in official documents to be a step
toward assimilation and therefore a loss of
identity.
Some
conclusions
The results suggest that the
importance of ethnic identity is salient for all groups and
therefore the integration of the Kazakhstani nation remains an
important problem for the country. Ethnic membership is the
fundamental social categorization which prevails in the identity
construction of individuals in society. For Kazakhs, the ethnic
identification is synonymous with national identity. Ethnic
membership has an important value in their construction of identity
and is considered an object of their pride. To be Kazakh means
having a privileged status in Kazakhstan. As a result of the
perceived threats, the feeling of ethnic membership among
minorities is strengthened to the detriment of their membership in
the nation. Russians and the other ethnic groups elaborate similar
strategies of preserving ethnic identity in confronting the
construction of the nation state based on Kazakh identity. The
interethnic relations in Kazakhstan possess an inherent conflict
potential and raise issues about the existence of national unity.
Ethnocentric policies are judged by Russians and other minority
ethnic groups as discriminatory and stress the ethnic and
linguistic differences between the Kazakhs and other ethnic
communities that do not favour the integration of the Kazakhstani
nation. The role of the intercultural psychologists in Kazakhstan
can be useful and even necessary in the analysis of critical
situations on the societal and on the individual level in order to
better understand potential conflicts and to look for
solutions.