Organizing
differentiated groups before the lesson
begins
T. splits the students
according to the level of language into three level
groups:
- green apples:
low-achieving
students
- yellow
apples: mid-achieving
students
- red apples:
high- achieving
students
As the students come in to
the class each student gets a small apple-shaped colored paper
labeled like this: “a green apple” or “a yellow apple”or “a red
apple” and takes a sit at the corresponding
table.
Introduction of the
topic and lesson objectives (5
min.)
-
SS. Watch Video 1. T. asks SS.
about the problem presented in the video. SS. give their answers,
T. writes the title “Aral Sea” on the board and asks SS. what they
know about the problem of the Aral sea in a short open class
discussion..
-
SS. watch Video 2 and name the
topic of the lesson.
Comment: T. might
adapt her metalanguage following to the natural progression of the
discussion, f.e. T. can ask SS to think about the topic by asking
follow-up questions to make SS name the natural disasters they know
and those ones that happen in Kazakhstan, think how they relate to
the videos and conclude what natural disaster of Kazakhstan is
going to be discussed at the
lesson.
-
T. presents the objectives of
the lesson and discusses them with the
students:
-
Listen for general
idea
-
Listen for specific
information
-
Read for
details
-
Create small
projects
-
Assess our work and set
learning objectives
Comment: T. asks
SS. how they understand the objectives and how
they
can achieve them (what they
can do and how).It’s a very important part of the lesson, because
to be able to understand the assessment criteria and, as a result,
to be able to assess and set personal learning objectives, SS. must
clearly understand what particularly they are expected to do and
how.
I. Pre-listening
stage.
b)
Pre-teaching vocabulary (2
min):
SS guess the meanings of the
words according to their definitions:
gradually (adverb) =
step by step
marooned (adjective)
= lost or left and forgotten
seabed (noun) = the
floor of the sea
a dam (noun) = a
special construction that gathers and keep the
water.
bustling (adjective)
= full of people and activity
extend (verb) = to
stretch out
come to terms with …
(coll.) = accept a sad situation
T. gives ready charts with the
words and definitions to each student and drills the pronunciation
of new words.
II. Listening practice .
Gaps completion and discussion.
a) Listening 1 (for general
idea): (3 min) SS. watch the video ‘BBC News
Aral Sea Man made environmental disaster’ (no subtitles or script
is provided) and answer to the open-ended questions (on slides) in
open class discussion:
1. What is the
problem?
2. Who are the
people on the video?
3. Are they happy or
sad?
b)
Listening 2 (for specific
information): (3 min) SS. watch the video again (the
script is provided) and fill in the gaps in the
script. SS use the previously
taught vocabulary in particular context, listening for specific
information. T. and SS. check the answers
in an open-class discussion.
Comment: T. and SS. check
and discuss the correct answers together in an open-class
discussion. SS agree or disagree with each other and suggest their
answers. Then the T .tells the correct
answers.
II. Post-listening
stage. Reading comprehension practice.
(10
min)
SS. complete the tasks
supplied to the text:
-
True/False sentences (for all
students)
-
Complete the chart to
structure the info (task for high-ach.
SS.)
-
Sequencing the events,
mentioned in the news video (task for high-ach. and mid-ach.
SS)
-
Multiple choice question (task
for low-ach. students)
Comment: T. might revise
the strategies discussing them with the SS while coming up to each
group for assisting them. For example, T. can ask SS to name the
main stages and techniques as skimming and scanning, underling key
words and key phrases, moving from the question to the text etc. to
remind SS. some point of reading techniques. Understanding of
lesson objectives and reading strategies is an essential part of
understanding what SS do and the assessment criteria for the
task.
T. and SS. check the answers
in groups: T. gives the keys to the tasks to each group and SS
exchange their papers in pairs and assess each other. Then they
prepare their report to the teacher.
Comment: peer- and
self-assessment promotes deeper understanding of common mistakes
and problems and better understanding of what can be done to
overcome them. So, the teacher comes up to each group to have a
short discussion on these issues and asks each group to conclude
and feedback on the problems and difficulties they have and suggest
their ideas on how they can be solved in their reports (on special
self-assessment sheets)
Extension
task. Problem–solving and
preparing a project
Comment: In this task SS
suggest some ideas on how the problem of the Aral sea could be
solved (if only it could be). The task does not aim at conducting a
really deep research on the problem, but more at making SS. think
about the problem and be aware of it, so to make it a part of SS’s
citizenship education. Also, the task aims at developing SS’
speaking skills as well as skills required for an effective public
speech presentation. At the end of each short presentation the
groups assess each other’s presentations according to the criteria,
introduced before the
task.
a) T. introduces the problem
and distributes the cards with the differentiated tasks for each
group of students (yellow, green and red
apples).
The
problem:
‘You are asked to support
a project created to study and attempt to return the Aral Sea. How
would you help the project?’
Differentiated
tasks:
-
Green
apples: Create a poster to
advertise the project and attract people to take part in
it.
-
Yellow
apples: Create and organize
activities for supporting the
project
-
Red
apples: Suggest particular steps
for improving the situation with the Aral
Sea
Comment: the tasks are
differentiated according to the level of thinking skills evolved
into the process of a problem solution. Red apples are to complete
the task requiring processing higher order thinking skills:
analyzing, evaluating the problem and creating and suggesting
particular solution. Yellow apples prepare the projects processing
higher and lower- order thinking skill: analyzing the problem and
suggesting some practical steps that could be applied for the
problem solution. Green apples complete the task processing their
lower-order skills: suggesting some practical application of
resources to understand the problem.
b) T. explains the rules of
self-management in each of the groups and asks SS to share
responsibilities in their groups and appoint the
roles: time-keeper,
editor, leader, creative
manager etc.
Comment: T. appoints the
‘speaker’ role obligatory for each of the student in the group, so
that each of them could present their ideas at the project
presentation stage; Also, T. provides some lexical scaffolding to
support SS (gives out some of topic-related vocabulary and question
structure pattern they might need to develop their ideas while
presenting and discussing their
projects).
c) T. discusses the criteria
of the project and its presentation together with SS and puts notes
on the blackboard (if necessarily).
The
Criteria:
-
Effective speaking (voice,
gestures, mimics)
-
Correct speaking (grammar,
vocabulary, pronunciation,
fluency)
-
Effective paper presentation
(design, general view)
-
Effective cooperation and
collaboration
-
Effective time-management (for
preparation and
presentation)
-
Task achievement(the adequate
solution is found)
-
Performance is well-organized
(nothing falls down or nothing is
lost)
Work on project (5
min)
SS work on their projects in
groups, T. assists and guides SS.
Comment: When coming up to
each of the groups for assisting, T. might discuss these criteria
with SS, ask them to explain how they understand each of them, put
some extra notes if necessarily.
Project presentation (5
min)
SS present their projects and
prepare questions to each other to discuss it in an open-class
discussion.
Comment: you can give extra
points to the groups for each good question performed to facilitate
open class discussion.
Peer- assessment (5
min)
SS assess each other’s
projects by colouring stars and supplying their comments in the
criteria sheets (if necessary)
Comment: The task ends as
an open class discussion, reflecting on all positive and negative
points of each project and the ways how they could be improved next
time.
Reflection (1-2
min):
SS get back to the lesson
objectives and check whether all the objectives have been achieved
or not. Ss reflect on their work at the
lesson.
Each student gets one of the
coloured paper faces (smiles) to raw its facial expression
describing the student’s feelings and emotions at the end of the
lesson. SS and raise their hands to show their smiles to each other
and the T.
Homework:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-a0c4856e-1019-4937-96fd-8714d70a48f7
Comment: the home
task is sent to the SS. via Kundelik.kz service as an attached
docx.-format document.
|