SPECIFICATION OF SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT FOR TERM
3
Review of summative assessment for term
3
Duration of the summative assessment – 40
minutes
Listening – 10 minutes
Reading – 10 minuets
Writing – 20 minutes
Speaking task is conducted
separately.
Total marks- 24
The structure of the summative
assessment
This sample of Summative Assessment consists of
14 tasks: listening, reading, writing and speaking. Different types
of tasks are used in the Summative Assessment for the
term.
Listening –gap filling task on the topic «Work
and inventions».
Reading –– open-ended questions on «This I
believe» essay on the topics «STEM» and «Reading for
Pleasure».
Writing – a creative «This I believe» essay on
the topics «Work and inventions», «STEM» and/or «Reading for
Pleasure».
Speaking – responding with fluency and
spontaneity while analyzing and annotating “This I believe” essays
on the topics «Work and inventions», «STEM» and/or «Reading for
Pleasure» during Socratic Seminar.
Tapescript for listening task can be found in
CD3 Tapescript 3. Transcript for listening task can be found after
the mark scheme.
Sample questions and mark
scheme
Tasks for the Summative Assessment for term
3
LISTENING
Task. https://learnenglishteens.britishcouncil.org/
1- variant
Write the word to fill the gaps.
-
Wingsuits are not very _______________, but the
modern ones are better than ever. 2. Last October was the first
ever wingsuit world _______________ in China. 3. You can buy a
wingsuit for 600 to _______________ dollars. 4. The water distiller
is for places where it’s hard to get clean _______________ water.
5. To produce the water distiller properly, they still need help
with _______________. 6. The ‘enable talk gloves’ were invented by
some Ukrainian _______________.
2- variant
Circle True or False for these
sentences.
1. Wingsuits allow people to fly or glide. True
False
2. Wingsuits are getting cheaper. True
False
3. Gabriele Diamanti's water distiller is
powered by the sun. True False
4. The ‘enable talk gloves’ help people to use
sign language in really cold conditions. True False
5. James Cameron invented a new underwater
camera. True False
6. MIT students have invented a new type of
ketchup. True False 7
Total [6]
READING
Task. 2Read the
text and answer to the questions.
Science Nourishes the Mind and the
Soul
BRIAN GREENE
ONE DAY, WHEN I WAS ABOUT ELEVEN, walking back
to Public School 87 in Manhattan after our class visit to the
Hayden Planetarium, I became overwhelmed by a feeling I’d never had
before. I was gripped by a hollow, pit-in-the-stomach sense that my
life might not matter. I’d learned that our world is a rocky
planet, orbiting one star among the one hundred billion others in
our galaxy, which is but one of hundreds of billions of galaxies
scattered throughout the universe. Science had made me feel
small.
In the years since, my view of science and the
role it can play in society and the world has changed
dramatically.
While we are small, my decades of immersion in
science convince me this is cause for celebration. From our lonely
corner of the cosmos we have used ingenuity and determination to
touch the very limits of outer and inner space. We have figured out
fundamental laws of physics— laws that govern how stars shine and
light travels, laws that dictate how time elapses and space
expands, laws that allow us to peer back to the briefest moment
after the universe began.
None of these scientific achievements has told
us why we’re here or given us the answer to life’s
meaning—questions science may never address. But just as our
experience playing baseball is enormously richer if we know the
rules of the game, the better we understand the universe’s rules—
the laws of physics—the more deeply we can appreciate our lives
within it.
I believe this because I’ve seen it.
I’ve seen children’s eyes light up when I tell
them about black holes and the big bang. I’ve witnessed the
self-worth and confidence a young student gains by completing even
the simplest of mathematical calculations. I’ve spoken with high
school dropouts who’ve stumbled upon books describing the amazing
achievements of science and returned to their studies with purpose
and zeal. I’ve received letters from young soldiers in Iraq,
telling me how reading popular accounts of relativity and quantum
physics has provided them hope that there is something larger,
something universal that binds us together. Such is the capacity of
science, not only to explain, but to inspire.
Which is why I am distressed when I meet
students who approach science and math with drudgery. I know it
doesn’t have to be that way. But when science is presented as a
collection of facts that need to be memorized, when math is taught
as a series of abstract calculations without revealing its power to
unravel the mysteries of the universe, it can all seem pointless
and boring.
Even more troubling, I’ve encountered students
who’ve been told they don’t have the capacity to grasp math and
science.
These are lost opportunities.
I believe we owe our young an education that
captures the exhilarating drama of science.
I believe the process of going from confusion to
understanding is a precious, even emotional, experience that can be
the foundation of self-confidence. I believe that through its
rational evaluation of truth and indifference to personal belief,
science transcends religious and political divisions and so does
bind us into a greater, more resilient whole.
I believe that the wonder of discovery can lift
the spirit like Brahms’s Third Symphony.
I believe that the breathtaking ideas of science
can nourish not only the mind but also the soul.
A native New Yorker, BRIAN GREENE teaches
physics and mathematics at Columbia University. He is a proponent
of string theory, which attempts to unify all the forces of nature
into a single framework. He authored The Fabric of the Cosmos and
The Elegant Universe.
-
1. Who is the author of this essay? Give
evidence from the essay to support your answer.
|
[1]
|
2. What is the author hoping to persuade the
reader of?
|
[1]
|
3. Why does the author include the personal
anecdote at the beginning of the essay?
|
[1]
|
4. Who is his intended audience? Give
evidence.
|
[1]
|
5. Why did he include different examples of
people who were inspired by science? The author uses logos to
persuade the audience. Give the examples of it and explain
why.
|
[1]
|
6. The rhetoric in this text is heavily
dependent on contrast. Find examples of these contrasts and
explain.
|
[1]
|
Total [6]
WRITING
Task: Write
“This I believe” essay. It should be an essay from your own life
about your core values but it is NOT an opinion piece about
social ideals. If it is difficult to start writing on your own
topic, you may choose one from these statements:
-
It’s okay to be afraid... just don’t let your
fears control you.
-
Do what you love to do.
-
It’s important to have friends that
care.
-
Big dreams lead to big things.
-
Laugh every day!
Follow these guidelines:
Tell a real story about
you: Be specific. Take your belief
out of the ether and ground it in the events that have shaped your
core values.
Consider moments when belief was formed, tested,
or changed.
Focus on one core belief.
Be positive:
Write about what you do believe, not what you do not believe. Avoid
statements of religious dogma.
Be personal:
Make your essay about you; speak in the first person. Avoid
speaking in the editorial “we.”
Total
[6]
SPEAKING
Task: Analyze
and discuss three “This I believe essay” which you have read and
annotated at home. Be ready to support the conversation and answer
the questions of your peers.
The most important questions for Socratic
Seminar are:
-
What is the author of this essay?
-
What is the audience of this essay?
-
What is the purpose of this essay?
-
What is the tone of this essay?
-
Did you like essays? Why? Why not?
-
Were these essays appropriate to read?
Why? Why not?
-
Do you share the author’s belief?
Why?
-
What does it take to follow one’s own path? What
sacrifices are required? What would you be doing, if you
could?
-
Has there been someone in your life who
instilled your beliefs in you or inspired you in that
way?
-
Stating an opinion
|
Expressing agreement
|
Expressing disagreement
|
Interrupting
|
The way I see it…..
|
You have a point there
|
That’s not always the case
|
Sorry to interrupt, but…
|
If you want my honest opinion…..
|
That’s exactly how I feel
|
I’d say the exact opposite
|
If I might add something…..
|
As far as I’m concerned….
|
I was just going to say that
|
No, I’m not so sure about that
|
Is it okay if I jump in for a second?
|
If you ask me…….
|
I have to side with smb
(name)on this one
|
I beg to differ
|
Can I add something here?
|
In my opinion…….
|
That’s for sure
|
Not necessarily
|
Can I throw my two cents in?
|
Mark
scheme
Listening and
Reading
Question
№
|
Answer
|
Mark
|
Additional information
|
|
Listening
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
1. 1. new 2. championship 3. 2,000 (or two
thousand) 4. drinking 5. investment (or money) 6.
students
|
1
|
|
2. video
|
1
|
|
3. outdoor
|
1
|
|
4. ranger
|
1
|
|
5. animals
|
1
|
|
6. journalism / writing / reporting
|
1
|
|
|
Reading
|
1
|
The author of this essay is a science teacher
who believes that science plays a huge role in the society and “can
nourish not only the mind but also the soul”.
|
1
|
Answers will vary; It will be great if learners
can write the whole paragraph answering the question, but one or
two reasonable sentences will be enough to count as one
point.
|
2
|
In his “This I believe essay” he proclaims
that not only science can explain “fundamental laws of physics” but
it can also inspire people, bring “the wonder of discovery” and
“lift the spirit like Brahms’s Third Symphony”.
|
1
|
Answers will vary; It will be great if learners
can write the whole paragraph answering the question, but one or
two reasonable sentences will be enough to count as one
point.
He believes that science unites people while
religion separated humans from each other: “Science transcends
religious and political divisions and so does bind us into a
greater, more resilient whole”.
|
3
|
The author uses a personal anecdote to show
that he also belonged to that category of people who had many
questions when he was young and thought that his life was
nothing.
|
1
|
Answers will vary; It will be great if learners
can write the whole paragraph answering the question, but one or
two reasonable sentences will be enough to count as one
point.
He wants to tell us that he was one of us to
make a contact with the audience.
|
4
|
The writer’s audience is intelligent people
who are eager to know more, who are interested in “the amazing
achievements of science and returned to their studies with purpose
and weal”.
|
1
|
Answers will vary; It will be great if learners
can write the whole paragraph answering the question, but one or
two reasonable sentences will be enough to count as one
point.
His audience believes that “there is
something larger, something universal that binds us together”- it
is science.
|
5
|
He gives many well-presented examples that
demonstrate the role of science in different age categories of
people.
These are ‘children’s eyes light up when I
tell them about black holes”, “dropouts who stumbled upon the books
describing the amazing achievements of science” and “young soldiers
in Iraq” who read scientific books in search of answer “that there
is something larger, something universal that binds us together. He
is trying to appeal to our emotions because we may belong to one of
these categories.
|
1
|
Answers will vary; It will be great if learners
can write the whole paragraph answering the question, but one or
two reasonable sentences will be enough to count as one
point.
|
6
|
The author juxtaposes science to religion. He
says that even soldiers who are very religious people read science
book in order to find answers to the questions.
|
1
|
Answers will vary; It will be great if learners
can write the whole paragraph answering the question, but one or
two reasonable sentences will be enough to count as one
point.
The author declares that science helps us to
understand “the universe’s rules - the laws of physics” because of
it we “can appreciate our lives” more deeply now. So even if we do
not know the answer to the question what “life’s meaning” is we
have got evidence from
“fundamental laws of physics” and “[he
believes] this because [he has] seen it” while religious people
simply believes without any proofs.
|
Total marks
|
12
|
|