Digitalization of Education in IB

Digitalization of Education in International Bachelor Programs: An Action Research Study in Computer Science

Abstract

The rapid evolution of technology has revolutionized educational landscapes, prompting a paradigm shift in teaching and learning methodologies. This research delves into the ramifications of digitalization within International Bachelor programs, focusing on the discipline of Computer Science. Employing an action research approach, this study aims to investigate the integration of digital tools in school settings, assess their efficacy, and propose recommendations for enhancing the learning experience in the realm of International Bachelor programs.

1. Introduction

The advent of the digital age has ushered in transformative changes across various sectors, with education being no exception. In the context of International Bachelor programs, particularly in the domain of Computer Science, the incorporation of digital tools presents both challenges and opportunities. As technology continues to reshape educational practices, it is imperative to explore the implications of these changes for educators and learners alike. This research seeks to understand the impact of digitalization on the educational environment within International Bachelor programs, focusing on the field of Computer Science. The primary aim of this research is to delve into the multifaceted effects of digitalization on education within the framework of International Bachelor programs, with a specific emphasis on the discipline of Computer Science. The study endeavors to assess the effectiveness of digital tools, comprehend challenges encountered during their implementation, and propose strategies for optimizing the integration of technology into the learning process. Our hypothesis posits that the strategic implementation of digital tools in Computer Science education, within the context of International Bachelor programs, will yield positive outcomes in terms of student engagement, understanding, and overall academic performance. Simultaneously, we anticipate encountering challenges related to technological infrastructure, teacher readiness, and variations in student digital literacy levels, which will need to be addressed for successful integration.

2. Methodology

2.1 Participants

Participants will include students and instructors from diverse International Bachelor programs, with a specific focus on those within the field of Computer Science.

2.2 Data Collection

- Surveys: Administered to both students and instructors to gather insights into their experiences with digital tools.

- Classroom Observations: Conducted to assess the integration of technology in teaching practices.

- Academic Performance Analysis: Examination of student grades before and after the digitalization intervention.

2.3 Intervention

A thoughtfully curated selection of digital tools, encompassing online learning platforms, coding environments, and collaborative tools, will be introduced into the Computer Science curriculum. Instructors will undergo training sessions to ensure the effective utilization of these tools in teaching.

3. Discussion

The findings will be comprehensively analyzed to identify patterns and trends related to the impact of digitalization on student engagement, academic performance, and the overall learning experience. Furthermore, challenges encountered during the intervention will be critically examined, and potential solutions will be proposed. This discussion aims to contribute valuable insights to the ongoing discourse on the integration of technology in education.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, this research endeavors to contribute substantively to the evolving dialogue surrounding the digitalization of education, particularly within the unique context of International Bachelor programs in Computer Science. By employing an action research approach, the study seeks to provide actionable insights for educators, policymakers, and stakeholders interested in optimizing the integration of technology within the educational landscape.

5. References:

1. Anderson, C. A., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80–97.

2. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press.

3. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

4. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.

5. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

6. Lai, K. W., & Hong, K. S. (2015). Technology use and learning characteristics of students in higher education: Do generational differences exist? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 725–738.

7. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

8. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

9. Reeves, T. C. (1997). Evaluating what really matters in computer-based education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 45–63.

10. Siemens, G., & Tittenberger, P. (2009). Handbook of emerging technologies for learning. University of Manitoba.